#1  
10th November 2018, 05:30 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Textile Chemistry or Chemistry, which is better to pursue in PhD?


Hello, is Textile Chemistry available in PhD? if yes, then Textile Chemistry is good to study in PhD or should I do Chemistry. I am studying Chemistry(H), Physics & Maths in BSc, but it seems like very tough for me. My aim is to do PhD in between Textile Chemistry and Chemistry of this course. So, kindly tell me which course is more promising in PhD and has greater value.




  #2  
30th September 2019, 11:59 AM
ME471
Senior Member+++++
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Kurukshetra
Posts: 5,840
Default Re: Textile Chemistry or Chemistry, which is better to pursue in PhD?

As per my suggestion, you should study a PhD in Chemistry rather than Textile Chemistry course. Doctor of Philosophy in Chemistry is Doctorate Chemistry course and the duration of this course is three years.

BEST JOB OPPORTUNITY

1. Food & Drink Industry

2. Plastics & Polymer Companies

3. Educational Institutes

4. Scientific Research Organisations

5. Environment Consultancies

6. Forensic Science Labs

7. Pharma Companies
Do you have any question? or have anything to say?



Related Topics:

Thread Replies Last Post
Can I become Teacher through UGC-NET? Details, procedure and subjects available to apply for UGC-NET? Is NET and SET are same? 2 15th September 2017 08:09 PM
In which one should I appear among CSIR NET and UGC NET being an MCA postgraduate? When the notification of UGC-NET for June session will be released? 2 14th March 2016 06:52 PM
Am I eligible to appear in UGC-NET if secure 55% marks in M.Com with 1 subject left to clear? Should I have to submit results of 2 years of M.Com if qualified in UGC-NET? 1 9th October 2015 01:03 AM
Whether UGC-NET and CSIR-UGC-NET are same? Date of upcoming UGC-NET? 2 2nd January 2015 03:41 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
Please also check: